ApyHub @apyhub

"Can a GET have a body?" Technically yes. Practically no. And DELETE is stricter — the spec actually says clients SHOULD NOT. People have assumed they were the same for years. They aren't. apyhub.com/blog/can-a-get…

x.com/i/article/2095…

We built an MCP server for 1500+ Tools We recently built an MCP server that lets your agent use 1500+ tools from one connector. The idea is pretty simple: Instead of wiring an MCP server to one API, then another, then another, the agent can search the catalog, find the API it needs, see what it does, and call it. @ApyHub has 450+ services and 1,500+ endpoints across things like file conversion, OCR, data extraction, validation, geolocation, SEO, image processing, and AI. So you can give an agent a fairly small set of tools and still have access to a much larger set of capabilities. Some examples: - convert a Word document to PDF - extract text from a PDF - OCR a scanned document - extract text from a webpage - compress a video - -generate a QR code - validate an EU VAT number - validate email DNS - convert currencies - parse a resume - check SERP rankings - generate speech from text The useful part is that these can also be chained. For example: Take a scanned invoice → OCR it → extract the data → validate the VAT number → convert the currency → generate a PDF. Or: Extract a webpage → check readability → summarize it → check its search ranking. You don't have to build those workflows ahead of time. The agent can compose the calls based on the task. There is also curation. Giving an agent 1,500 tools creates tool bloat and overwhelms the model with context. Instead, you can select which endpoints an agent may use: a document agent might have 15–20 endpoints, while an enrichment agent uses a different set. One other thing we cared about was credentials. Normally, connecting an agent to ten vendors requires ten API keys stored somewhere in the agent’s environment or context. Those traces eventually appear in logs, observability tools, bug reports, etc. With ApyHub, the agent uses one scoped key. The MCP server is at: apyhub.com/mcp And the catalog is here: apyhub.com/catalog The thing I’m most interested in is what people actually try to make their agents do with the catalog. There are a lot of boring utilities in there already, but there are always going to be things we haven't covered yet. If you have any questions, I’m happy to assist :)

@SdkSaddik this is amazing that you are exploring ApyHub. Plus the API you mentioned + all the rest are MCP read so directly callable by your agents as well! did you try this?

One small developer task that can become surprisingly annoying: turning a webpage into a clean PDF. You can build the conversion yourself, reach for a library, deal with rendering differences, then spend time maintaining something that isn't really your product. I explored @apyhub Webpage to PDF API, and the approach is refreshingly simple. Send it a URL, configure what you need, and the API returns the PDF while preserving the webpage's visual layout. That makes it useful for things like generating downloadable reports, archiving web content, or adding PDF exports to a product without building the conversion layer from scratch. This is the kind of API utility I like. Not because it's flashy, but because it removes a small piece of engineering work you probably don't want to own forever. ApyHub has 200+ certified APIs across common developer utilities, so there's plenty more to explore. apyhub.com/catalog

If I had to assemble a lean open-source stack for content, research, and AI workflows tonight, I'd start here: 1. VoidenHQ/voiden github.com/VoidenHQ/voiden Why: API documentation and testing get messy when they are not versioned like code 2. karakeep-app/karakeep github.com/karakeep-app/k… Why: saving links is easy, finding the useful thing later is the real problem 3. usebruno/bruno github.com/usebruno/bruno Why: API testing should not turn into a whole separate SaaS universe Not a top-tools list. More like a compact operating system for moving without guesswork. Which piece would you install first?

Anyone can ship. Almost nobody plans for year three. Our CEO @samuelkaluvuri on the cover of The #EnterpriseWorld, and the five rules he actually runs on: • build for the long term • solve the hidden problem, not the loud one • trust in v1, not in the audit • reliability beats novelty • more features ≠ more value Which one does your team break most? theenterpriseworld.com/samuel-kaluvur…

Good evening frens I recently explored @VoidenMD and I really like the idea behind it. If you build APIs, you probably know the struggle of switching between different tools for testing, documentation, notes, and requests It quickly becomes messy. @VoidenMD brings everything together in one place. Instead of keeping your API requests in one app, your docs in another, and your tests somewhere else, Voiden lets you manage them together using simple Markdown files Since everything is stored like code, it's easy to organize, version with Git, and share with your team. What also stood out to me is that it's offline-first and open source You don't need to create an account or depend on a cloud service just to work on your APIs. If you're a developer, here's how to explore Voiden: • Visit the website and understand the main workflow • Download the desktop app for your operating system • Read the documentation to learn the basics • Open the GitHub repository to see the source code and examples • Create your first API request in Markdown • Try organizing endpoints, headers, authentication, and parameters into reusable blocks • Connect it with Git to track changes over time • Experiment with scripting using JavaScript, Python, or Shell for more advanced automation. I enjoy discovering projects that solve real developer problems instead of adding more complexity Voiden feels like one of those tools worth checking out. I saw inside @myfanforce Spotlight

@mrbullish @_abgweb3_ thats the idea!

@_abgweb3_ amazing! we have now hit 300+ APIs and counting...

I spent some time exploring @apyhub today, and honestly, it’s much more comprehensive than I expected. A lot of developers end up rebuilding the same things over and over again PDF conversion, OCR, file processing, validation, image analysis… They’re essential, but they rarely define what makes a product unique. That’s where ApyHub stands out. Instead of stitching together dozens of services, it brings hundreds of APIs under one platform with a single API key. Even better, it’s built with AI agents and MCP compatibility in mind, not just traditional applications. What caught my attention isn’t simply the size of its API catalog. It’s the philosophy behind it: developers should spend their time building features that create value, not maintaining repetitive infrastructure. With over 200 APIs and 1,000+ endpoints, ApyHub already offers a solid foundation. Combine that with enterprise grade security, a unified subscription model, and an AI first vision, and it becomes a platform that’s hard to ignore. As AI continues to evolve, I believe platforms that simplify integrations instead of adding more complexity will become increasingly valuable. ApyHub is definitely one I’ll be keeping an eye on. 👉: apyhub.com

This month, @apyhub turns five. 𝗪𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆, the one that takes us beyond a traditional API marketplace. 🎂 Software is still written, but increasingly, it's composed. Assembled from existing capabilities, integrated by developers, and called by both applications and agents. We founded @apyhub on that belief. Today we are shipping our biggest release since day one. And it moves the platform in two directions at once: diversity and maturity. 🔹 𝗗𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆. @apyhub is now open for providers to publish. Point at your endpoint, review the docs we auto-generate, and publish. Raw API to monetized, discoverable product in under 10 minutes. And through our native #MCP server, #agents don't get a static tool list, they search for the exact capability they need and call it at runtime. 🔹 𝗠𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆. A platform others build on has to behave like infrastructure and infrastructure meets its users where they are. So we added a US region alongside the EU. Your calls can now run closer to your apps, no plan change. And we rebuilt the #apigateway for real workloads :spiky, parallel, one task fanning out into hundreds of calls. Those bursts now get absorbed, not rejected. ⭐ What hasn't changed is why we started: - #Developers should spend their time shipping great software, not rebuilding the same plumbing over and over. - #APIProviders should spend theirs building great capabilities, not running the business machinery around them. 200+ services. 1,000+ APIs. One subscription. All continuously monitored and maintained. This is where modern software comes to call the capabilities it's built from. And it gets deeper every week. Go see it. We think you'll feel the difference. A big thanks for all the developers, users and customers who have been using @apyhub from day one. Their ideas, insights and suggestions have always been the main inspiration for whatever we build! 💛 💛 apyhub.com

Most teams don't need more AI models. They need fewer APIs to stitch together. That's why platforms like @apyhub are interesting: → File conversion → Data extraction → PDF tools → Utility APIs → AI-ready workflows Less time building plumbing. More time shipping products. What API do you wish existed but doesn't yet?

@ABUweb34 thanks for sharing this! we now have many more APIs + a new logo :)

10 open-source repos I’d test for marketing, content, and AI-product growth. Not a random GitHub dump. The filter is simple: can this repo remove a real workflow pain or create a content angle people understand fast? 1. generalaction/emdash github.com/generalaction/… Why: multiple coding agents need orchestration, not eight terminal tabs and hope 2. keploy/keploy github.com/keploy/keploy Why: API tests are painful when mocks, traffic and real behavior live in separate worlds 3. rerun-io/rerun github.com/rerun-io/rerun Why: robotics and multimodal systems need visual logs people can actually understand 4. VoidenHQ/voiden github.com/VoidenHQ/voiden Why: API documentation and testing get messy when they are not versioned like code 5. langgenius/dify github.com/langgenius/dify Why: AI apps need workflows, data and evaluation, not just one more prompt window 6. Fincept-Corporation/FinceptTerminal github.com/Fincept-Corpor… Why: internal dashboards should be faster to ship than a full custom app 7. lightdash/lightdash github.com/lightdash/ligh… Why: business dashboards become slow when every metric needs a custom analyst pass 8. metabase/metabase github.com/metabase/metab… Why: teams need answers from data without turning every question into a data-team ticket 9. koala73/worldmonitor github.com/koala73/worldm… Why: news and global signals become hard to track when everything is scattered across random feeds 10. usebruno/bruno github.com/usebruno/bruno Why: API testing should not turn into a whole separate SaaS universe Which one should I break down first?

@InvestorLee19 @xzkevs definitely!

@xzkevs I'm being looking for the right one lately I guess I'll just try this out 🤔

@HottieBabeGem @xzkevs awesome! let us know how you find it!

@D_GREAT_EHMY @xzkevs thanks!

@0xsamarai @xzkevs you should! and let me know if you need an API that is missing!