Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

Bitcoin developer meetup serving the Research Triangle NC ⚡[email protected] #nostr npub18z4n70qxqv40xef4je7fd0zya462gmkhvf2eax695f6sfgrk9yvq55lrpv trianglebitdevs.org Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill, NC Joined November 2021

Tweets

1K
Followers

687
Following

123
Likes

490

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

20 hours ago

@lopp How do you keep it running all the time without drowning in work to sift through the output?

0 0 3 100 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

2 days ago

@K_Hargesh @TPB_Inc @AllThingsOpen Ah! This is me hashpool.dev/media/

0 0 0 35 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

2 days ago

luma.com/9xek7fmc

0 0 0 12 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

2 days ago

Join us tonight for the first AI Builders meetup! Come and see what other folks are building. Share your projects, tips, ideas. Beginners welcome! 6:00 @ DBCo in Durham RSVP 👇

1 0 0 37 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

3 days ago

A Carolina King 👑

Documenting ₿itcoin 📄 @DocumentingBTC

5 days ago

In 2020, Carolina Panthers offensive tackle Russell Okung announced that half of his $13 million salary would be converted into bitcoin. The NFL would not pay him directly in bitcoin. He had to use a third-party service who converted approximately $6.5 million of his salary into

43 45 867 69K 36

0 0 0 56 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

3 days ago

@K_Hargesh @TPB_Inc @AllThingsOpen I'm not on the schedule. I'll be in the audience, though!

1 0 0 81 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

4 days ago

job title: cypherpunk company: none The corporate mind cannot comprehend...🤯

0 0 2 62 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

5 days ago

@jurbed > ship with a switch that lets the vendor put it into a safe state remotely This has been attempted in the past with a much lighter touch. It was deemed too risky and removed. bitcoin.org/en/alert/2016-…

0 0 1 19 0

View Details

Juraj Bednar🏴💛🌘 @jurbed

7 days ago

In August the Core Lightning maintainers told node operators to upgrade or run --offline. There was nothing to upgrade to for another two days, and when v26.06.7 arrived it was binaries only, with the source held back a further two weeks so attackers could not reverse-engineer the fixes. We (me + AI models) used that window. Ten AI models, one public source tree, the same five sentences of prompt, under $100 between them. Every report was hashed into the Bitcoin blockchain with OpenTimestamps as it was finished, nine days before upstream published the source, so none of it can be backdated. Reading source, the models found four of the nine defects the release fixed. Running "strings" on the public download found five more, and one of those is theft that pays for itself: as a forwarding node you refund the sender upstream, and the peer then claims the outgoing HTLC on-chain with the preimage it held the whole time. You pay twice and collect nothing. It was findable because the patched binary carries upstream's own new log line, FUNDS LOSS, which names the function, and the vulnerable code sat in the public v26.06.6 tree throughout. Three models at three price points landed on it within minutes of the download. The embargo hides the patch, but not the mechanism. Write-up: juraj.bednar.io/en/blog-en/202… Full case-study, reports and timestamps: github.com/jooray/CLN-inc…

6 14 78 7K 21

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

5 days ago

@stutxo I met the creator. He wears a facemask in public so you know you can trust him lol.

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

5 days ago

@stutxo I understand the spending path is...difficult. There is an easier way. Convert to a BIP32 seedphrase for existing wallet compatibility. v1.penlock.io/en/

1 0 0 10 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

5 days ago

Lopp: "It's a much deeper question than whether to freeze coins or not" BM Editor: "The Quantum Issue: To Freeze Coins Or Not"

Jameson Lopp @lopp

a week ago

In this essay I argue the quantum migration debate is far more nuanced than just "freeze or don't freeze vulnerable bitcoin." Rather, it's a question of how to minimize total property-rights violations if ECDSA no longer reliably proves rightful ownership. bitcoinmagazine.com/print/the-quan…

61 14 55 16K 30

0 0 0 42 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

5 days ago

@DocumentingBTC @halfin 🐐ed RIP Hal 🧡

0 0 0 88 0

View Details

Allod @allod_dev

5 days ago

Maybe it's just me but I never see an AI doomer who changes his own oil. I wonder why that is...

0 1 1 14 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

5 days ago

luma.com/9xek7fmc

0 0 0 16 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

5 days ago

We're starting a new AI builders meetup. Join us this Tuesday! RSVP 👇

1 1 2 46 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

2 weeks ago

@otaliptus @theinstagibbs if it's any good the ai lab will just publish it out from under you

0 0 0 29 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

2 weeks ago

How much a bitcoin cost

1 0 0 43 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

2 weeks ago

How about some mining protocol seminars?

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

2 weeks ago

wen chaincode ark developer seminar?

1 0 1 16 0

View Details

Triangle BitDevs @TriangleBitDevs

2 weeks ago

Remember that decade when everyone treated lightning and bitcoin as coequal projects? Two protocols to conquer the world. lol I'm glad we're moving beyond that now.