Samuel Sey @SlowToWrite

@DTheKingpin lol I knew I would find you here, man. 😂

The production of this song is incredible. That is the only commendable thing about this. The lyrics are man-centered, self-affirming nonsense. There is nothing Christ-honouring about this. Kirk Franklin is, sadly, just as worldly as GloRilla.

First Class 🏁 @1DJFirstClass

2 days ago

Kirk Franklin & GloRilla Made An Anthem With “This Time” 🔥⛽️

885 5K 27K 3.2M 7K

@HilaireNereus 😂😂😂😂

People keep posting this screenshot of me, so I'll respond. • My wife Ashley has been public about her testimony years before this post. I would never write this publicly without her approval. • Ashley is so changed by the gospel, that's she'll gladly share of what her life was before Christ, what it is now, and how God can save anyone. After all, Paul did this too, and he didn't withhold details about his past life of sin (Acts 26:1-29), so sharing our lives before and after Christ on occassion is entirely biblical. • I can count the number of times I've shared my wife's story publicly on one hand. I share it when I discern it "is good for building up someone in need, so that it gives grace to those who hear" (Eph. 4:29). It'd definitely be concerning if I frequently leveraged her story for numbers. God forbid. • The context of my below screenshotted post was a reply to a semi-viral post that was dividing Christians: "Better to marry a former OF model who has come to know the depths of her sin and the mercy of the Lord, than an unkissed virgin with a haughty look and a proud heart." My response: "My wife was a camgirl, among many other things, before Christ. August 15, we celebrate five wonderful, gospel-centered, Christ-focused years of marriage. “Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much.” (Luke 7:47)". I was grieved of the unbiblical perspective many were having, and wanted to help guide people toward the biblical understanding that marrying a godly spouse is of the utmost importance; marrying a virgin is not more important (1 Cor. 7:39). • I'm not a feminist, a liberal, a simp, or an egalitarian. These are all unbiblical and real problems, and I'm grateful for others who speak against them. I've written many times about the biblical mandate for husbands to take responsibility in their homes as the head of their wives and children, for men to man up and be more bold, and for wives to submit in everything to their husbands (Eph. 5:24). I just see all too often that these voices frequently lack the gospel and lack a balance in their teachings by rarely, if at all, equally admonishing men to tenderly love their wives, be defined by gentleness (Gal. 5:22-23), and dwell with her in an understanding way, which is of equal importance (1 Pet. 3:7). • I believe people love to mock me with this screenshot when red-pill masculinity affects their thinking more than the gospel does. To the unredeemed mind, it's usually unfathomable that one would share of their spouse's past sexual immorality, or even of their own many past sins. And don't get me wrong: sin is serious. Sexual immorality and other sins are devastating, and sometimes sin's consequences can even be lifelong in God's good plan. But when the gospel affects our thinking and our hearts primarily, it changes everything. You're able to look at people through the lens of compassion, gentleness, and understanding. The cross frees us to think biblically, to walk in Scripture-centered balance, to treat sin seriously, lead our wives well, and to love our family and others best, since marriage is, after all, a picture of the gospel (Eph. 5:32).

Joel Webbon @JoelWebbon

2 days ago

@TrevorSheatz You’re just another feminist simp.

36 11 314 41K 9

@ryanmauro I’m not promoting them. I was simply responding to the other person’s post. Nevertheless, I’ll check out your post.

This person has already prepared his excuse for rejecting yet another confirmation of historical biblical events, if it really is true that Noah’s Ark has been found. But he has unknowingly affirmed something we Christians (should) know. Moses wrote his (God’s) account of Noah’s flood about 900 years after the flood. In Genesis, Moses makes references to existing records of genealogies that he uses as a source. The Bible also says that Moses was educated by the wisdom of the Egyptians (Acts 7:22) This suggests that Moses used a mixture of existing records and divine revelation to write Genesis—just like the Apostles. So what does all this mean? Moses would have known about the other accounts of the flood. The Bible never makes the claim that Moses was the first to write about the Flood. It makes the claim that it’s the only true, inerrant, authoritative account. Accounts of the flood like the Epic of Gilgamesh and the dozens of others like it by many groups around the world make it more likely that the flood really happened—and the differing accounts of what really happened with the flood also make it more likely that the Tower of Babel is also a true, historical fact. But most importantly—if we use inductive reasoning—Noah’s account is the most likely to be true, based on its relationship with other things that have been proven to be true from the Bible. His account is also affirmed by Jesus, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Luke, and Peter. And since the other Mesopotamian or pagan accounts of the flood do not share the details about the Ark. Noah’s account is completely unique about the dimensions, size, and type of watercraft). So if Noah’s Ark is found, it would absolutely be proof that his account is true, inerrant, and authoritative. And the other accounts were just pagan distortions of the truth.

Forgotten History @4gottnHistory

4 days ago

They claim they’ve found Noah’s Ark, but there’s a problem. The story of Noah appears to be a remix of much older Mesopotamian flood stories, which also describe a man building a vessel to survive a devastating flood. The biblical account appears to reuse many of the same

2K 182 2K 3.1M 765

Ahem…this is another great reason to go to church.

Brad Wilcox @BradWilcoxIFS

2 days ago

"No group of Americans seems to be having more sex—and more satisfying sex—than married men & women who regularly attend a place of worship. In fact, we find the only Americans who have avoided the country’s “sex recession” are husbands & wives who attend religious services at

258 865 9K 1.7M 3K

Your idiot friends on the Right are trying to hand Ohio to a communist governor because Vivek, the most far-right gov candidate Ohio has had in generations, is brown. If you mean what you say here, use your platform to call Ohioans to vote for Vivek and stop the Left. I know you won’t. Because you are captured by the pagan racialist right more than you care about stopping the Left.

To be clear, in this clip Vivek explicitly talks about making Ohio more attractive so (1) an increasing number of *Americans* from other *states* will want to move to Ohio; and (2) an increasing number of Ohioans will stay in the state, bear and raise children there, and their children will want to stay as well. This post misuses the word “immigrant,” which typically refers to someone who arrives from another *country.* Most people would not refer to an American who moves from Illinois to Ohio an immigrant. I get that some people on the right don’t like Vivek. They apparently would rather have a left-wing Democrat as Governor instead. But if you have to resort to this kind of misinformation, you aren't a reputable voice.

AF Post @AFpost

2 days ago

Vivek says he will increase the population of Ohio by 33%, flooding the state with immigrants. Follow: @AFpost

466 596 6K 283K 801

@peterpeccavi I actually haven’t had a hot beaver tail before. I’ve heard of it, but I don’t think I’ve had it. Some pastry shops near where you are will have it.

@peterpeccavi Please tell me you’ve had the croissant. I love their croissant and hot chocolate (I don’t drink coffee). There are Tim Hortons here in Ohio. Not the same, but good enough!

@Rob0scott You’re a Leafs fan, so who cares what you think??? 👀

The manliest men I know do not brag about how manly they are. They do not talk about how “effeminate” other men are compared to them. They do not talk down to women. They honour their wives, daughters, and all Christian women. They do not change their mind every 5 minutes to chase the latest fad in Christless conservatism that will attract more weird men to their podcast. They are older men who have a track record of faithful discipleship, marriages, and parenting. They are not young, untested, ambitious, weak boys who want to lose their souls to gain followers on social media. They are manly because they are godly. And believe it or not, some of them do not have beards.

@MerylsaMess Thank you, ma’am! You are encouraging!

I don’t know why these people think their juvenile insults do anything but store up wrath for them. Am I stupid? Often, I am. I’ve been telling my wife it’s my mission to convince her that I really am stupid. Am I fat? Yes. 😭 I don’t want to be a fatty no more, though. I’m working on it, so my kids will stop treating my belly like a trampoline. Am I a monkey? Na. I am worse than that. Monkeys are smarter than sheep, and that is what I am: a sheep. But I’m grateful that I have my wise and Good Shepherd. Am I a Nigger? Well, I am black. Congrats to this person for knowing the Latin word for black. Ad gloriam Dei sum niger = It is for the glory of God that I am black.🙂

Have those of you with this view considered that the earth appears very old because God didn’t make a “baby earth?” As in, Adam was a grown man despite being only a day old when he was created. On the first day of creation, the earth didn’t look a day old either. There is no contradiction between what the Bible says and what creation says—they have the same source. But we must interpret creation with scripture to truly understand creation.

Joel Berry @JoelWBerry

3 days ago

Not sure where you got this idea, but I’m not a young earth creationist, necessarily. The Earth appears very old, as does the fossil record. I won’t pretend to understand how it worked exactly—and I think a faithful reading of God’s Word allows for a few different possibilities.

79 14 556 62K 19

Brother, have you considered that the earth appears very old because God didn’t make a “baby earth?” As in, Adam was a grown man despite being only a day old when he was created. On the first day of creation, the earth didn’t look a day old either. There is no contradiction between what the Bible says and what creation says—they have the same source. But we must interpret creation with scripture to truly understand creation.

Check out the latest episode of the @TheNarrativeCCV. This week, we talked to @Katy_Faust about gay “marriage” and the horrific dangers of gay surrogacy. Then @aarbaer I talk about Nicole Hannah-Jones’ NY Times article about her daughter, the education system, and “segregation.” We also talk about mass immigration, heritage Americans, American identity…and we name names! You can watch and listen on YouTube or wherever you like to listen to podcasts. youtu.be/KRsJ7jnFT20