SINK @SinkProject

Real sustainability scores. No greenwashing. 500+ companies rated 0–100 — one formula, public data, open methodology 🌍 sinkproject.com United Kingdom Joined September 2025

Tweets

442
Followers

224
Following

2K
Likes

894

SINK @SinkProject

a week ago

sinkproject.com/company/spotify

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

Spotify SINK sustainability score: 58/100 ~98% of its footprint isn’t Spotify at all. It’s cloud, ads and marketing (Scope 3). Emissions fell 31% in 2024 as users grew 10%. That’s real decoupling. Weak spot is water: 3/10.

1 0 0 12 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

sinkproject.com/company/boohoo

0 0 1 10 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

Boohoo (now Debenhams Group) told investors last week its marketplace pivot is working: less stock on its own books. That doesn’t cut the carbon. 97% of its footprint is still in the supply chain (and air freight isn’t counted). SINK sustainability score: 18/100

1 1 0 26 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

sinkproject.com/company/ben-je…

0 0 0 26 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

Ben & Jerry’s sustainability score: 41/100. The founders are at war with Magnum over the “social mission.” Ben wants the brand back. Emissions rose 3% and the 2025 climate target slipped to 2035. Still top of the 8 dairy brands we’ve scored so far. Who should we score next?

1 1 7 16K 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

sinkproject.com/company/a-p-m-…

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

Maersk ordered 26 giant container ships today. They run on gas. They arrive in 2030. Ships last ~25 years. Maersk promised net zero by 2040. SINK sustainability score: 29/100

1 0 0 18 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

sinkproject.com/company/rivian

0 0 0 28 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

Rivian’s 2026 guide is now 65–70k with R2 ramping. That’s the growth story. SINK sustainability score: 34/100. Absolute emissions rose with volume; Scope 3 once jumped ~108% as production scaled. Reporting well isn't the same as decarbonising.

1 0 0 13 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

sinkproject.com/company/games-…

0 0 0 4 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

Games Workshop's AGM was today. Record year — £660m revenue. The sustainability numbers tell a different story. Scope 1+2: down 69%. Target smashed six years early. Scope 3: 93% of the footprint, still rising, no target at all. Cleaning up the factory is the easy part. 41/100.

1 0 0 12 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

sinkproject.com/company/balenc…

0 0 0 9 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

2 weeks ago

Shailene Woodley's Emmys look got the internet arguing about Balenciaga all day. Balenciaga's sustainability score: 32/100. Same as Zara. Zero brand-level emissions data. The outfit is debatable. The disclosure isn't.

1 0 0 40 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

3 weeks ago

sinkproject.com/company/anthro…

0 0 0 6 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

3 weeks ago

Anthropic and OpenAI just agreed to independent evaluators inside the labs. For model safety. On the environment they disclose almost nothing. Sustainability scores: Anthropic 31/100 OpenAI 25/100 No emissions data, no energy mix, no targets. Same method as everyone else.

1 0 0 16 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

3 weeks ago

Full Premier League sustainability table: sinkproject.com/sector/profess…

0 0 0 15 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

3 weeks ago

Manchester derby at Old Trafford today. We rated both clubs on what they actually publish about sustainability — emissions, energy use and targets. Man City: 56/100 (2nd of 20) Man Utd: 25/100 (17th of 20) Same city. Same league. A 31-point gap. Why? One club publishes substantially more evidence than the other.

1 0 0 49 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

3 weeks ago

Most viewed on SINK today: TK Maxx: 42/100 They sell what other brands couldn't shift. Bargains for us. A safety net for an industry that makes too much. Their own shops: 7/10. Emissions down 37% since 2017. Their supply chain: 2/10. 20,000 suppliers. No emissions figure for the clothes. They count the shop. They don't count the clothes.

0 1 1 8K 0

View Details

SINK @SinkProject

3 weeks ago

Apple's first foldable: $1,999. 93 kg of carbon over its life. The 18 Pro: 63 kg. And it uses less recycled material, not more. Apple put the numbers out. That's rare. The numbers still say the same thing: Two screens and a hinge weigh more on the planet than the price tag suggests.