G @QuestionAbyss

@StephenABoydPh1 Biology, being a direct product of both physics and chemistry, doesn't have that vast, "space of the possible unknowns" like physics and chemistry do. It's bounded by physics and chem.

1 0 1 13 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

9 hours ago

@StephenABoydPh1 I think "life" is just another gap-filler/weasel word... if we read between the lines with the fact that rooms full of experts have not been able to pin it down, it's probably because it's a flawed concept.

1 0 1 22 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

9 hours ago

@GypsyWind269 ...via anesthesia, injury, or chemicals, instantly alters awareness and cognition (commonly called "consciousness"), proving the localized biology itself generates our thoughts and identity without cosmic explanations.

0 0 1 18 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

9 hours ago

@GypsyWind269 Science doesn't need to explain the entire cosmos to reliably demonstrate that human consciousness arises from physical brain activity... Because altering the physical brain... (Con't)

1 0 1 19 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

16 hours ago

Also, @GypsyWind269, if you find me making logical errors, can you let me know which errors (which logical fallacies or cognitive biases) they are so I can revise my statements appropriately.

1 0 3 209 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

9 hours ago

@GypsyWind269 ...perfectly accounts for doesn't change reality; it just duplicates it unnecessarily. Ultimately, waiting for science to discover a soul is like waiting for a microscope to prove the existence of magic; reality is already profoundly complete without it."

2 0 1 16 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

9 hours ago

@GypsyWind269 To answer your question: We don't need new tools to look for a hidden 'soul system' because the tools we already have show us exactly what is doing the work. Inventing a second, invisible system to explain what the physical system already... (Con't)

1 0 0 18 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

12 hours ago

@LilJoe926 LMFAO!!!

2 0 1 28 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

13 hours ago

@NihilAbsurdist @GypsyWind269 x.com/QuestionAbyss/…

G @QuestionAbyss

13 hours ago

@GypsyWind269 Thank you very much for this, Adam! So, your explanation is a good example on why I see terms like "soul" or consciousness" as reifications and that is because, once we start to attempt to explain and/or justify them... (Con't)

1 0 1 47 0

1 0 2 29 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

17 hours ago

Today folks, I need your assistance. I am not actually trying to convince, but rather, get a sufficient understanding of @GypsyWind269's stance and perspective as well as to convey my own in an easy-to-understand way... (Con't)

4 0 5 205 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

13 hours ago

@lyssasphere ^^^THIS!!!

0 0 2 23 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

17 hours ago

Do you know and understand what reification is?

5 1 7 367 0

View Details

G @QuestionAbyss

13 hours ago

@Olivert72170564 @GypsyWind269 Excellent question! Brain cells go the fastest because they are the most metabolicaly active, while bone and cartilage cells can be months because they normally reside in a low metabolism matrix.