July_Developer @July_Developer

@Lutaayagodcia It all depends on the age of the boys, unfortunately the author did not specify the age of the victims

@BTV_Cast Physical destruction of ships during the battle

@YourAnonCentral

Space and time reconstructed in 4D Is this how higher dimensional beings see us - every moment at once? Starting to understand what Vonnegut meant by humans being “great millipedes” - clearly it applies to our four legged friends too! Geolocated 2d video → per frame 3d gaussians → each left precisely where & when it happened

The most beautiful idea in Kaluza–Klein theory? What appears to be a force in 4D can be force free motion through 5D geometry. A particle can follow an ordinary geodesic, its natural unforced path, in five dimensions. But when we observe only its 4D projection, that same motion appears to obey the Lorentz force law of electromagnetism. Meaning, higher dimensional geometry can appear to a lower dimensional observer as force. The same relational principle appears in scalar fields. A scalar field has magnitude but no direction. Its gradient does. If the field couples to matter, that gradient can act like a force. The scalar itself is not the force. The relationship across the field is. More dimensional freedom changes how a field spreads. Projecting higher dimensional motion into fewer dimensions changes how that motion must be described. Dimensional compression does not change the underlying physics. It changes what the physics looks like. So a force law may be the observable signature of dimensional constraint, not the fundamental mechanism producing the motion. What appears to us as force may be geometry viewed with one dimension missing.

Olivier Minazzoli @OMinazzoli

a week ago

So I asked Astra whether Entangled Relativity’s Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton (EMD) coupling could come from a higher-dimensional theory. Its value is 1/(2√3), compared with √3 in 5D Kaluza–Klein theory and 1/√3 in the type IIA reduction discussed below. 1/7

9 16 133 49K 73

@JTitor17 A desperate propaganda attempt to explain to people before the election why they should vote for a party run by an orange idiot.

@Maxim6827114179 @PetrenkoAndryi Свіно собака із під ВПН на свинячій мові розповілає про рашку

@WhiteHouse This is a deliberate distortion! Any news the orange pedophile doesn’t like, he dismisses as “fake news.”

@rob_vendetti Trump is a pedophile! Putin has compromising footage of Trump having sex with underage girls. That’s why Trump does whatever Putin wants—he has leverage over him, and it benefits Putin!

@chaysgovnom3 Первая половина видео о том что секс им очень важен, вторая половина видео - хочет продать свой вареник подороже… И на ёлку залезть и жопу не уколоть… По итогу найдет того кто будет ее пиздить и трахать и будет счастлива.

@SAMOYLENS_K Ксения но ведь ты ж сама допускаешь слова паразиты, указывающие на то, что ты продаёшься…

@OlgaFluke Похлебка для тупой ваты

@noFrontMilitar Никакого истощения нет, это проявление героизма!

@overclassifiedx Because UFO technology is being handled by private companies that steal these technologies, claim them as their own, and build multibillion-dollar businesses around them.

@MaksiAdd @NaSutkiOdessa x.com/SashaSever12/s…

Sasha Sever Мерность седьмого Я✨✨✨ @SashaSever12

5 days ago

Итак на всех участках страны..

22 67 307 11K 52

@chonkrider Twitch is watched by kids who have little money and lots of free time.

@Oleksii88877 Якась хуйня, наляв багато води смислу 0

Oxford researchers argue that LLMs can never invent anything. It is mathematically impossible. They published a paper called “Theory Is All You Need" and it argues against the claim that computational models can generate genuine novelty or new knowledge. They analyzed the limits of generative ai, and the results are a brutal reality check for the idea that ai will replace human decision making under uncertainty. Here is why AI is stuck and human cognition wins: backward-looking vs forward-looking.. llms are probability machines that look backward at existing data. human cognition is forward-looking and capable of generating genuine novelty. human cognition operates theoretically "top-down" rather than "bottom-up" from data. the "data-belief asymmetry".. the researchers use the invention of "heavier-than-air flight" to illustrate this concept. an ai relies on data-based prediction, which is largely imitative. humans, however, use theory-based causal logic that allows them to hold beliefs that go beyond existing data. the intervention gap.. humans don't just process information; we use theory to practically "intervene" in the world. we engage in directed experimentation to generate entirely new data. ai-based models are theory-free and place primacy on existing data and prediction. tldr? AI uses a probability-based approach to knowledge and ia largely imitative. It can process data and make predictions, but human cognition relies on theory-based causal reasoning. The decades-old analogy comparing human minds and computers to mere "input-output" devices is fundamentally flawed.

For 50 years, science told us genes were fixed our destiny written at birth. In 2003, the Human Genome Project quietly shattered that belief. What it revealed instead is a discovery in epigenetics that should be taught in every school on Earth: 1. The old model said: you have a gene for anxiety. A gene for depression. A gene for heart disease. A gene for early death. You inherited it from your parents. Your children will inherit it from you. Nothing you do changes it. The Human Genome Project; a 13-year, $3 billion study was supposed to confirm this. Instead, it revealed something no one expected: Humans have roughly 23,000 genes. Less than a roundworm. The "genetic destiny" model collapsed overnight. 2. What emerged in its place was the field of epigenetics, the science of how your environment controls your DNA. The discovery: genes do not determine your life. Signals from the environment turn genes on and off. And the environment that matters most? Your internal environment. Your thoughts. Your emotions. Science now shows that the emotion you sustain for as little as 15 to 20 minutes a day can signal your immune cells to begin producing new proteins. Your emotional state is writing instructions to your DNA. Right now. 3. In Dr. Joe Dispenza's workshops, students measured for gene expression changes after just 4 days. Significant shifts detected. IgA the immune marker increased measurably. New proteins. New enzymes. New hormones. From thought and emotion alone. No drugs. No surgery. No supplements just the mind-body connection in action. 4. This means: The disease your parent had is not your sentence. The anxiety that runs in your family is a pattern not a prophecy. The body you inherited is not the body you're confined to. You are not a victim of your biology. You are the author of it. Every day you choose the emotional signals you flood your cells with and those signals are rewriting the program. 5. The most powerful pharmacy in existence is inside you. You don't need a prescription for it. You need a practice.

@TomBombadilNB Це 100% хуйлобот