Tim Noakes @ProfTimNoakes

The ANC's leadership over the last 32 years, vote wisely 4th Nov.

THIS IS BIG! The Cancer Cells That Changed Their Minds A KAIST team just reversed cancer without killing a single cell — and the method may matter more than the result. For a century, oncology has had exactly one strategy: find the cancer and destroy it. Chemotherapy poisons it. Radiation burns it. Surgery cuts it out. Immunotherapy teaches the body to hunt it. Every weapon differs in precision, but not in philosophy. The tumor is an enemy. You win by killing. Now a team at South Korea's KAIST has proposed a heresy: *what if the tumor doesn't need to die?* In a study led by Professor Kwang-Hyun Cho of the Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, published in Advanced Science ("Control of Cellular Differentiation Trajectories for Cancer Reversion," DOI 10.1002/advs.202402132), researchers took colon cancer cells and — without poisoning, irradiating, or cutting them — turned them back into normal cells. Not dead. Not damaged. Just normal again. The tumors, grown in mice, shrank dramatically. The surrounding tissue was left intact, because there was never an attack to survive. This is early research — cell lines and animal models, no human trials, real obstacles still unsolved. But the conceptual break is the story. For the first time, cancer treatment has a second verb. Not just destroy. Also: convert. The digital twin of a cell The KAIST team's insight begins with a redefinition of what cancer is. The conventional view treats cancer as a pile of broken machinery: mutations accumulate, checkpoints fail, cells proliferate. Cho's group looked at the same evidence and saw something different — a trajectory. During oncogenesis, they observed, normal cells don't just break. They regress, sliding backward along the differentiation path they followed when they matured. A colon cell becomes, in effect, a confused stem cell: immature, proliferative, lost. If cancer is a wrong turn on a developmental road, then the treatment question changes. You don't blow up the road. You build a map and find the turn. That map is what the team calls a digital twin — a complete computational model of the gene network governing a cell's differentiation. Using data from 4,252 intestinal cells, they reconstructed a network of 522 interacting components, capturing how genes regulate one another as a cell matures or degrades. Then they did the audacious thing: they asked the simulation which levers, flipped together, would push a cancer cell back down the road toward normalcy. The answer came through a system they built called BENEIN (Boolean Network Inference and Control), which models gene interactions as logical relationships and systematically tests which interventions redirect the network's state. The simulation pointed to three master regulators — the genes MYB, HDAC2, and FOXA2 — acting together as the switch that holds the cancerous state in place. Turn all three off simultaneously, the model predicted, and the cell would stop proliferating and differentiate into something resembling a normal intestinal cell. They tested it, and it worked. In three colon cancer cell lines, suppressing MYB, HDAC2, and FOXA2 together strongly induced differentiation into normal-like cells. The cancer cells began expressing markers of healthy intestinal tissue. Proliferation collapsed — not because the cells died, but because they grew up. In animal models, tumors formed from the reprogrammed cells were dramatically smaller than controls, and under the microscope they looked far more like normal tissue. The signature achievement, and the one that would matter most to any patient reading this: there was no collateral damage. Nothing was poisoned, burned, or irradiated. The healthy tissue never came under fire, because there was no fire. 1 of 2

🚨 “SIX MONTHS TO LIVE.” THEN HER 90-DAY IVERMECTIN + FENBENDAZOLE STORY TOOK A DRAMATIC TURN Irene was diagnosed with stage IV pancreatic cancer. She was reportedly given only six months to live. With little hope left, she reached out for help. What followed was a 90-day journey involving Ivermectin + Fenbendazole, strong family support, and a follow-up CT scan that, according to the story, produced an extraordinary result. 📃 THE 90-DAY PROTOCOL She was reportedly recommended a 90-day protocol that included: 💊 Ivermectin 💊 Fenbendazole With strong support from her family, she followed the plan consistently. Every step. Every day. For 90 days. No shortcuts. 📊 THEN CAME THE CT SCAN After completing the protocol, her husband encouraged her to get a CT scan. According to the testimonial, that scan reportedly changed everything. Her oncologist reportedly confirmed: 📊 No Evidence of Disease (NED) 📄 “CANCER-FREE” ❤️ FROM “SIX MONTHS” TO ENJOYING LIFE AGAIN Today, Irene is described in the story as healthy and strong, enjoying life with her family again. For supporters of repurposed-medicine research, stories like this are powerful because they raise an obvious question: What happened? Could an outcome like this potentially tell researchers something worth investigating? ⚡ BUT THERE'S AN IMPORTANT DISTINCTION This is a testimonial, not clinical evidence. Individual cancer stories cannot establish that Ivermectin or Fenbendazole caused the reported outcome. Critics correctly point out that controlled clinical studies are needed to determine whether these medicines have meaningful effects in cancer. Still, stories like Irene's continue to circulate online and generate intense discussion. And one thing remains consistent across these conversations: When people hear “Stage IV cancer” and “six months to live”... They don't stop searching. They start exploring every possible option. That's why discussions around repurposed medicines continue to grow worldwide. ❓ THE QUESTION THIS STORY LEAVES BEHIND If a reported 90-day protocol was followed by an NED result, should stories like this be investigated more rigorously in larger clinical trials? That's the conversation worth having. 📌 SAVE & REPOST so others can review the story and draw their own conclusions. 💬 If a 90-day protocol was followed by this reported outcome, do you think it deserves deeper clinical investigation? #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #CancerTestimony #Stage4Cancer #MedicalResearch #RepurposedDrugs #CancerResearch

When Elon Musk showed he’s a master of reverse psychology after someone asked, “Why should I invest in Tesla rather than Mercedes-Benz?

The Pandemics will end when the Pandemic Planners go to prison…

South Africa says apartheid was wrong because people were judged by race. Yet in 2026, race is still written into employment policy. The government calls it redress. Fine. But here's the question nobody wants to answer: When does correcting yesterday's racial discrimination become today's racial discrimination? If equality means anything, it cannot depend on which colour you are. Judge the individual. Not the race. Not the history attached to their surname. The individual. Otherwise we've changed the people holding the racial spreadsheet — not the system.

Mebendazole and ivermectin should be available over the counter—affordable and accessible to everyone. Dr. John Campbell said he was shocked after reviewing an ivermectin cancer study: “We could be curing cancer with ivermectin and mebendazole.”

Elon nailed the double standard. If we shipped 100,000 Americans to Greenland, elected an American prime minister, and voted the place into the U.S., the left would lose their minds. Do that to Europe through mass immigration and they call it progress. Same playbook here. Import the votes. Change the country. Then act shocked when the natives notice. Europe is the warning. November is the off-ramp. Vote Republican. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Donald Trump is the cleanest person on the planet. The entire power of the Deep State investigated him for years. They got nothing. He’s so clean they had to create fraud reasons to spy on him. And still got nothing. It’s not even debatable at this point. It’s remarkable.

yep

Paul Pureblood .. @rowton007

2 weeks ago

6 62 111 2K 12

Joe Rogan just said the quiet part out loud... the scientist whose papers get quoted every time someone says “vaccines don’t cause autism” has now pleaded guilty in U.S. federal court. Poul Thorsen, co-author of the landmark Danish studies used for years as the go-to proof, admitted he ran a multi-year wire fraud scheme and stole more than $1 million in CDC grant money that was supposed to fund Autism and infant disability research. He forged invoices, diverted the cash to himself, bought a house, cars, and a Harley, then spent over 14 years as a fugitive before being arrested in Germany and extradited. On September 1, 2026, he stood in an Atlanta courtroom and pleaded guilty. Rogan’s point was simple: the guy they keep citing just got caught stealing the money meant to study the very question. That should alarm anyone who was told the science was settled. When one of the most-cited names in the “no link” argument turns out to be a convicted thief of the research funds themselves, people have every right to demand a harder look. The official story never wanted this conversation. Now it’s in court records.

Given that 13 different plausible mechanisms ( horrifying) of the Covid jabs causing cancer have been identified by Professor Angus Dalgleish any significant spike after 2021 has to place THAT public health calamity as the major driver until proven otherwise. INVESTIGATE NOW!

Michelle Dewberry @MichelleDewbs

2 days ago

I’ve just watched a whole BBC documentary about the rapid increase in cancer among the young.. It explored food & lifestyle choices, even body sprays & plastics. Not once tho, did they explore whether getting young healthy people vaccinated over & over with a product that had

1K 3K 14K 768K 379

Parks Tau says 48 black industrialists got R23.4 billion from the IDC in 2025. That is about R487 million each. They will not publish the list. Of course they will not. Sunshine is bad for industrialists who only industrialise other people’s money. Factories still closing. The cadres get the cheque. Everyone else gets the speech.

Daily Investor @DailyInvestorSA

2 days ago

Trade Minister Parks Tau revealed that 48 black industrialists benefited from the R23.4 billion disbursed by the IDC in 2025. dailyinvestor.com/finance/158337…

119 61 124 50K 50

Know your DA !! Globalist open border agenda!!!:

Mpho @RamaphiriMpho

2 days ago

The man who is about to single handily destroy South Africa . Watch how the crime rate is about to rise more , unemployment rate is already on the runaway ceiling and the infrastructure is already falling but it’s going to be worse . WELL DONE LEON A ZIONIST WHO DESTROYED SOUTH

91 297 657 33K 28

It’s happening .. February 2026 The jury found the doctors liable, awarding $1.6 million for pain and $400,000 for future medical expenses .. This case is the first of its kind More lawsuits like this coming . Take them all broke !!!

Once upon a time, not all that long ago, medical authorities thought that the best way to resolve scientific controversies was to air them out, discuss the evidence on both sides, what was known and what was not, and so establish what research was needed to settle the issue. Well, those days may be gone. Now researchers, influential authorities (and, of course, our friends the health reporters) have decided that given the opportunity to review a vitally important subject, their job is to advocate for what they believe, ignore the counterarguments and inconvenient evidence and hope for the best. In my latest Substack, I discuss three very recent examples of this advocacy phenomenon, and compare it to how scientists used to discuss controversial science, back when they were more interested in getting the right answer than establishing their authority.  Discussing Controversy in Medical Science: Air It Out or Sweep It Under the Rug? uncertaintyprinciples.substack.com/p/discussing-c…

Well who would’ve thought… Genius.

Elon Musk: ”At Gigabay, We’re expanding integration to produce 1,000 Starships per year. The structure itself is enormous, by some measures, it will be the largest building on Earth, And it’s designed for 1,000 Starships a year. We’re also building a Gigabay in Florida, so we’ll have two facilities, one in Texas and one in Florida.”

20,000 Tickets Sold: Stormers vs. Sharks ▪︎ A season record thus far Now to release our teamsheet early and the rest will sort itself out 😉 #STOvSHA #URC #Springboks @THESTORMERS

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next